Why LOGICS don't work when it comes to GOD ?
1:15 PM
sarvhim
When I was small- 8-9 years old, I used to ask lots of questions to my father.
And the "conversation" often used to went like this :
Me : Why is it raining ?
Father : To provide water to us, son..
Me : But what causes it to rain ?
Father : When clouds can't hold any further water, it rains..
Me : Then who gave water to clouds ?
Father : When hot sunlight falls on water of earth,it flies to clouds..
Me : How it flies ?
Father : It becomes steam and flies, my son...
Me : But, why water becomes steam ?
Father : son, On heating of water it converts itself to steam...
Me : Ok, but, There has to be water on earth for that,
This earth water came from where ?
Then my Father reacts in one of these ways :
1. Keep silent now, These questions are useless. OR
2. Ignored my question and go to do some work.. OR
3. Son,Water is on earth already,there is no why to it,
don't ask any further questions...
But poor me still not satisfied....
CONCLUSION:
Logics, in itself, are never completely satisfying, there has
to be assumed something,in the last, without any reason...
There is a word too "axiom" which means fact which don't require any proof.
Ask a person, who never went out of his small village, this question:
Is there any Japan ?
Even then he may reply : I don't know.
But there are some persons, who claims, at once, there is no god.
I don't know how they reaches to this conclusion.
So, please understand that "GOD CAN'T BE REALISED USING LOGICS alone" .
THANX FOR READING, if YOu :)
DO you agree ??
Read more:
Limits of logics
Need of religion
Me : Why is it raining ?
Father : To provide water to us, son..
Me : But what causes it to rain ?
Father : When clouds can't hold any further water, it rains..
Me : Then who gave water to clouds ?
Father : When hot sunlight falls on water of earth,it flies to clouds..
Me : How it flies ?
Father : It becomes steam and flies, my son...
Me : But, why water becomes steam ?
Father : son, On heating of water it converts itself to steam...
Me : Ok, but, There has to be water on earth for that,
This earth water came from where ?
Then my Father reacts in one of these ways :
1. Keep silent now, These questions are useless. OR
2. Ignored my question and go to do some work.. OR
3. Son,Water is on earth already,there is no why to it,
don't ask any further questions...
But poor me still not satisfied....
CONCLUSION:
Logics, in itself, are never completely satisfying, there has
to be assumed something,in the last, without any reason...
There is a word too "axiom" which means fact which don't require any proof.
Ask a person, who never went out of his small village, this question:
Is there any Japan ?
Even then he may reply : I don't know.
But there are some persons, who claims, at once, there is no god.
I don't know how they reaches to this conclusion.
So, please understand that "GOD CAN'T BE REALISED USING LOGICS alone" .
THANX FOR READING, if YOu :)
DO you agree ??
Read more:
Limits of logics
Need of religion
why don't u make a thread on it in atheist vs theist instead of just a poll?
there are axioms
they are A self-evident or universally recognized truth
like 2+2=4 it requires no proof
then there are observations like sun goes around earth and then the assumptions like sun revolves around the earth if assumptions are verified by given facts like the position of sun at different times they are logics
when an assumption is made there are many effects it entails to be logic like if sun moves around earth it should look like this at this time and so on if it does not the assumption is negated as was negated by Galileo
then more assumptions are made till we find an assumptions whose entailed effects are verified by facts if it does happen then the assumption can be called a logic
continuing if after an assumption is verified and it becomes logic it gives rise to new facts when we make a assumption and to explain a phenomenon and it can be verified by earlier logics it can be called theorem
like one may come up with Pythagorean theory if it is proved by axioms of math and trigonometric facts it is theorem else it is mere assumptions
god was an assumption like to explain sun's movement around earth it was assumed that a sun god with chariot carries it around earth and so on with many phenomenons
if this assumption was true then sun had to move in a way which it did not later it was assumed that earth moved around sun instead
so the assumption of god was negated the same way assumptions of all gods so far have been negated give me any one that has not been
now movement of earth around sun became an event that needed to be explained so was observation of apple falling on newton's head it was found that all bodies attracted each other and the attracting force was found to vary directly with mass and inversely to square of distance so it was assumed that a force exists between all matter it was named gravitational force it was verified see google for more
now if this force was responsible for movement of earth around sun then centripetal force required must be equal to this force so square of velocity of earth must be directly proportional to it's distance from earth and so it was hence verified not all assumptions are verified a very much accepted ether theory was negated by Einstein it was the biggest negation of a such a well accepted theory ever known
so as long as there is no verifiable theory about god he can deemed to be non existent
lalit - my childhood friend
mohan - my colleauge
chawla - mt fav sweet shop
what a coincidence !!!
well bro, u mentioned galileo,einstein, c dis
"In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited
human mind, am able to recognize there are yet people who say
there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they
quote me support of such views"
-- ALBERT EINSTEIN
"Atheism is so senseless"
--SIR ISAAC NEWTON
"God is known by nature in his works, and by doctrine in his
revealed word"
--GALILEO
You can google these quotes, if u want, u'll find dozens of pages containing them.
Einstein hated atheist strongly but he didn't supported personal(individual) form of god..
Well I could hv provided their url but then u'll
also provide url of atheist support, so a wastage of time,
Now bro if u can read dis, u will get reasons to be a theist, not challenge, but its my promise..
http://sarvhim.blogspot.com/2009/11/request-to-atheistsagnostics-appeal-to.html
http://sarvhim.blogspot.com/2009/10/why-unfairness-in-world-all-about.html
http://sarvhim.blogspot.com/2009/10/benifits-of-belief-in-godreincarnation.html
Good day bro :)