realizing the life

My preassumption :
I think that atheists/agnostics want to have fairness in world,
but they don't have sufficient reasons to realize that
god/fairness exists.
Persons who don't come under this assumption may kindly ignore
this topic.

My objective :
To realize atheists/agnostics that god/fairness exists.
And I appeal theists, to please help me in this objective.

Note :
I am in no way challenging anyone that I'll prove it.
I want to have a discussion, whose only objective is to
conclude the correct conclusion and NOT that whether who is
currently correct. Be it me or anyone else.

                DISCUSSION

Point 1:  What is meant by God ?
God is creation or the existence itself.
No seperate creators.
It's not any individual identity.
Upto this interpretation of God almost everyone will agree.

Point 2:   Whether God/existence is fair or not ?
Disagreement starts with this point
One life is not fair often, no doubt.

Assumption (and not conclusion)  :
That reincarnations/rebirths happens.
If we assume this then there is possibility of existence
of fairness in world.

Point 3:   If so, why one life is not fair ?
To test/examine unconditional mentality of every individual
when one is not aware of rebirths.

Point 4:  Why this test ? What for ?
Taking point 1 in consideration, this test is not taken by
any individual.
Actually individual person,itself is the organizer of this
test and not GOD/existence.
Because if one'll do sins or good deeds, then obviously
there is need of effects on account of causes.

Point 5 : Who and how implements the results/effects ?
Firstly there is no individual examiner, effects of
causes are implemented by itself. Or you can say that
some kind of mental trace of causes sticks to individual.
And this trace produces effects at appropriate time.

Question that remained unanswered :
What/when is appropriate time ?

Point 6 :  This is my request.
We need to realize that unless we understand each and
every aspect of universe, some questions will remain
unanswered.
This is because of limitedness of our language/words.
We can't express everything using language.
Even if someone know those answers, he can't
express or we can't understand them using language.

Point 7 : Sorry, but one more realization
This is, perhaps, almost same as point 6.
For the existence of any and every logic, there is
need of existence of "something" which don't need
any further logic. This is because if we ask of logic
of existence of "something", then answer to this question
will produce one more logic with "another something" which
don't need any further logic.

Point 8 : Of course, This is not final and only a possibility.
There is possibility of Points (1-7) with an assumption of
rebirth.

Now I expect that atheists/agnostics will agree that
there is possibilty of above points.
And that they will not say, at once, that there is no
God/fairness..
Do you ?
Read more:
God's proof
Need of religion
Creator and creation